Carolyn Foster Segal

On the Loss of a Tree

by Carolyn Foster Segal

The Chinese Elm came down among a series of deaths—first of my father and then my husband’s mother and my mother, followed soon after by the death of a good friend.

I grew up in a family of avid readers and equally avid gardeners. I was fortunate enough to be able to combine those two interests by creating a series of courses on nature writing for the university and college where I taught and by working on a series of yards—my own and those of family members and friends. Our first two children were five and one when my husband and I decided to trade our row home and its tiny courtyard on the south side of the city for a house with a “real” yard. And it was the yard—one third of an acre—that seduced me. I once said (actually, I said it more than once) that even if the house had been a shack, I would have bought it just to have that property, which included a Chinese Elm.

And it was there that I rediscovered, through hard work and practice, the full joys of gardening that I had first delighted in when I was young and trailing behind my father and his father. I worked on the tree line, the long curving section behind the back wall of the house that had plants for every season, the shade bed beneath the maple tree we planted, the beds that surrounded not only the front and the sides of the house but those of the shed we built, which our granddaughter Amelia would call “your tiny house.”

After 30 years, we moved roughly half a mile away to a one-story house that was more accommodating for my mother, who came to live with us, and that would allow us as well to age in place. The house sat on a half acre, and the property was a blank slate. One of my new neighbors told me that I was the first owner he’d ever seen step into the back yard. We moved in in November. In December, while snow fell, I began my plans for spring.

Meanwhile, the buyers of our old house were also busy planning. First to go was the Chinese Elm in the front side yard. Our old neighbors alerted us early in the morning, but there was nothing we could do.  The last survivor of the farmer’s fields that developers took over in the 70s, the tree was (pun intended) the crowning jewel of the property and the surrounding neighborhood.  Over 100 years old, multi-trunked and taller than the third-story attic of the house, it was a tree that commanded awe and attention. We felt very fortunate; we also felt a responsibility. Carefully maintained by us and a certified arborist, the tree was not only a striking exemplar of its own history but a symbol of the city’s rural past. When the buyers expressed concern, I argued for its pedigree, but they reminded me of Robert Frost’s neighbor, who can only, mulishly, say, “Good fences make good neighbors.” Where we had seen beauty, health, shade, the new couple saw only sticks and danger (the only danger was their attitude). Next to go were the azaleas and rhododendrons planted beneath the front bay window. It was our old lawn worker who told us, explaining that he had cried when he’d driven past and realized what had happened. In their place were two large rocks, one inscribed with “Go Penn State!”

The couple continued on their path of deconstruction, tearing out the lily bed that I planted when I was pregnant with our third child, and then eliminating the hydrangeas, coreopsis. and yarrow. They decimated the back tree line, filled the beds that lined all four sides of the house with large white egg-shaped stones, and turned the beds that framed the shed back to lawn.

But they still weren’t finished. One day last August, my friend Carol texted me a cloudy video with the caption “TREE CUTTERS.” “What’s left?” I asked my husband. “All that’s left is the maple tree,” he said, “and even they wouldn’t cut that down.” Carol’s next text arrived: “I think it’s your maple tree.” The next morning I drove over to the neighborhood. I turned onto the street behind our old block to get the best view, a view that was now quite open. The forsythia that had flourished in the back corners was gone; the only remaining traces were large ovals of dirt.

I surveyed the barren landscape (no shade, just those blindingly reflective white stones): the maple tree had indeed been cut down, although the stump remained. In the now yellowed grass, dirt tracks led away to the front. The yard looked like the setting for an abandoned house, all human inhabitants long gone, having fled the scene of some terrible crime. The birds, of course, had left as well. The robins, titmice, cardinals. and doves were missing; after all, there were no seeds or nesting materials, no places to nest. There was no sign of the blue heron that used to perch on the patio roof.

The sheer ugliness was shocking. I felt first rage and then an overwhelming sense of sorrow—all that work to create and maintain a place of health and beauty gone, just gone. What is the loss of one or two trees in a time of terrible personal and universal losses? Nothing. Everything.

In the days that followed, as I worked in the garden of our present home, I thought of W. S. Merwin’s poem “Witness.”  I could still see the Chinese Elm. I could see our parents and our friend Anita sitting in our old garden; I could see our children’s younger selves running in that leafy yard. And I thought of how we were, for a brief while, the guardians of something living and beautiful in this broken world. What to do with all my grief and longing?

For the first time in months, I began to write.

 

Carolyn Foster Segal lives and writes in Bethlehem, PA. From 2000 to 2015, she was a frequent contributor to The Chronicle of Higher Education; her poem “The Mirrored Room” was one of two winning entries selected for December Magazine’s 2020 Jeff Marks Memorial Poetry Prize.

 

Christopher Buckley

Christopher Buckley on “Neutrinos


Starting the late 1980s cosmology and science started to become subject matter for my poetry.  I came across some articles in The New Yorker on newly discovered Dark Matter and that caught my imagination and supported my agnosticism, my sense of doubt that had for years been pushing back against a childhood in which I was raised Catholic.  Faith vs. doubt was and remains a driving force in the writing.  I read more articles on recent findings and theories in cosmology and also read several books written for a popular audience, those of us with only 7th or 8th grade science educations.  To get across to us, to sell books, the science writers and astronomers had to use a lot of metaphors and leave out a lot of math.  Just the thing for me.  I watched many PBS Nova TV specials and eventually had enough material for a book of poems entitled DARK MATTER.  My method was to combine the science with life events and my own history as well as speculation about what is, or more to the point, isn’t there, finally.

In his BBC series and book by the same name, The Day the Universe Changed, James Burke pointed out that the universe has changed about every 50 years, meaning our understanding of it based on new discoveries changes.  Most of the “new” science in my book Dark Matter is now out of date or in question.  So it goes.

But the battle between hope and despair is the bedrock of a lot of the poems.  I realized early on that I shared an essential view with Charles Wright who said, “All my poems seem to be an ongoing argument with myself about the unlikelihood of salvation.” That is what an orthodox religious upbringing will do for you, once you realize what is most likely in the cards.  And if you share that view with Charles, there are not many crumbs left on the table when you get there.  Nevertheless, there it is, and I seem to come back to it often.   And voice has always been my concern, the authenticity of its tone that comes from essential human concerns and does more than report on amazing facts.

The events in “Neutrinos” were reported perhaps a number of years back.  Neutrinos have always been an amazing aspect of subatomic particle physics; they have a very small mass, which might even be zero—bits that are and are not there, that pass right through us largely undetected, that can move at near-light speed.  It is important to me to “do” something with the information, to find meaning in it for my life and thinking, hence the 3rd stanza of the poem.  I try to pull the details into my own orbit of thought and existence.  I never arrive at an absolute conclusion . . . I don’t know that the scientists arrive at one?  And like many, I love Einstein—beyond his genius, his grasp of the ironies and contradictions the cosmos presents as well as his understanding of humanity.  Time and eternity . . . it keeps me wondering.

 

Jed Myers

However Intimate the Elements: A Craft Essay on “Having First Heard of the Ivory-Billed Woodpecker on its Being Pronounced Extinct

by Jed Myers

I believe a poem has its moment of conception—a moment we may not be conscious of, and that might never be recognized, even when it leads to the viable birth of a lasting vibrant piece of writing. And if that first spark does register in awareness, it may be forgotten even before the poem that comes of it is formed enough to be born. Memory of a poem’s conception may be lost in the very immersion that is the poem’s further development. I’ve been curious about such moments of conception. How does the world seed us with these beginnings, and can it help our craft to look into this?

Here's an instance in which I had some lasting awareness of a poem’s conception. It was late summer, and I’d read the news that the ivory-billed woodpecker had been declared extinct*. I felt a little ashamed that this was the first I’d ever heard of the ivory-billed woodpecker, so I’d taken some time to look up what I could about the creature—where it lived, how it sang. It was troubling, this loss of a particular winged form. It added to my chronic worry and sorrow over the disappearance in our era of countless species. The image of a lone bright-beaked bird, the last of its kind, on a branch in a humid forest persisted in the background of my musings. 

The poem, “Having First Heard of the Ivory-Billed Woodpecker on its Being Pronounced Extinct,” had not yet been conceived. I hadn’t yet entertained any notion of writing on the matter, and I hadn’t yet taken a certain afternoon walk in my part of Seattle.

My walks frequently take me across a footbridge that spans a creek ravine. The view of the treetops above the creek is reliably magnificent in all seasons. There’s a preponderance of deciduous growth, owing to the logging of these slopes over a century ago. I feel more deeply at home when I’m surrounded by leafy trees rather than conifers, as I grew up in Pennsylvania in the company of big maples, oaks, and sycamores. When I took this particular walk, it was the end of September—autumn had begun flaring the leaves, there was a drizzle in the cooling air, a chill in the breeze, and it stirred my memories, sad and sweet, of times in that little valley and on that same bridge with my kids when they were small. I recalled the exhilaration of one summer afternoon, holding my toddler son up in one arm to let him see over the bridge rail—his squirming exuberance, for me, a thrill. And savoring that recollection, I imagined how I might’ve gestured with a sweep of my free hand, showing my little one that what lay before us—wooded expanse, distant mountains, clouds . . . all of it together—was home. Not a house we’ve made but the living surround that makes us.

The poem had still not quite been conceived. I was about to remember the ivory-billed woodpecker, and to picture it perched on a branch nearby, pecking and calling where I’d seen other woodpeckers through the years—the piliated, the downy, the flickers—and listened to their fast drumming. I was about to wonder what other creatures these woods were losing.

By then, I was caught up in more reverie than memory—in a swirling-together of recall and fantasy, a spin of reminiscence’s joy and sorrow, a mix of possibility’s brightness and futility’s blues. In that thrall, I felt the visceral rush of the years like a wind through my core—felt and in a way saw my son leaving my arms for the sky before me as if on wings, “flown” into the wide world that was his home.

It was a moment of exquisite convergence—elation and emptiness, wonder and despair. Those trees, whose fall-singed leaves gleamed softly in the misted light, harbored life and the dwindling forms of life. I heard the thin groan of a small-engine prop, a seaplane heading down toward Lake Union most likely, and I felt my loneliness in that lean music. I felt the helplessness of not being able to protect that child released into the unknown, and I felt the undeniable fullness of having nurtured and set loose a new life.

This, I’d say, was the moment of the poem’s conception, though I still had no thought of writing. Over the days that followed, I’d return to that surge of remembering, feeling, wonder, and sensation. I’d experience the inner press to “do something” with it, which could mean talking about it, walking back to the bridge again, actively reaching back into those memories, looking up more about the ivory-billed woodpecker and other disappearing species . . . or it could mean  writing.

I can see from here how I might never have written the poem. But it did gestate, started kicking, and soon pressed for emergence. Once it was born, I nursed it with revisions, until I felt it was ready to, well, fly.

Now, as I write about the poem’s becoming, I also recognize how it might keep becoming—not in my hands, but in the responses of others. Will a phrase in this poem set another’s memories resonating? Will another’s unique reverie be catalyzed?

And I’m thinking, whatever “craft” is exercised in the making of this or any poem, it’s only a holding, carrying, nourishing, ushering . . . until the creation flies off. From complex mysterious conception to the poem’s journeying out among other lives, however intimate are the elements it’s made of, it’s never really the crafter’s. The world writes our poems—they come through us, not from us. And I believe this sense of non-ownership, regarding poems or children, helps keep our practice humbler, less forced, more reverent, and more tolerant of what we may not understand of these creations life commissions us to foster.

 

*The ivory-billed woodpecker was subsequently found not to be extinct.

Sarah Carey

Sarah Carey on “The Attraction to Niagara

The one and only time I have been to Niagara Falls was over 20 years ago during a side trip from Buffalo, where my husband's middle son was soon to be married. I've never forgotten the sheer magnificence of the steep walls of water, or how it felt to be surrounded by the roaring rush of sound so full of nature’s primitive ferocity. I remember feeling overwhelmed and so small in the face of the kind of beauty someone could die for — and, as I learned from a guide there, many had.

I also noticed that the fencing around the area where we were seemed very low and not well made or fortified, and was shocked at how easy it would be for anyone wanting to take that final plunge, to do so. I thought to myself: why on earth wouldn't there be more precautions, more protections, more signs, guards, etc., at a place like this, to protect people from themselves?

Images of the falls along with questions I formed during and after my visit stayed with me for some time. I started doing some research into the place's history and learned a lot about the daredevil exploits of the tightrope walkers whose names are part of the local lore as well as national history. I actually started working on this poem soon after my trip there — yes, two decades ago — but never could quite finish it. And yet, I couldn’t stop thinking about it, either.

One of the things I do to jumpstart my creative process, especially when I don't feel I’m capable of writing something new, is to excavate an older poem from my “dead,” or inactive files, and contemplate it again, with the detachment of time hopefully working in my benefit, to see if it might speak to me.

This was such a poem. The devastating beauty of the falls struck a chord within me as perhaps it sings to a self that is haunted by whatever it is we all would be willing to live, or die, for, as well as the juxtaposition of nature's forces with the forces of human nature. “The Attraction to Niagara” was my attempt to wrestle with that juxtaposition.